The Authority of the PIC Must Always Be Respected

In today’s aviation industry, the authority of the Pilot-in-Command (PIC) and the cockpit crew is increasingly being challenged, particularly regarding Captain’s discretion on duty times and decisions related to flights into conflict zones. Some airlines are treating these critical safety decisions as mere contractual obligations rather than respecting the fundamental principles of aviation safety.

Captain’s discretion is a safeguard designed to allow pilots to make informed decisions regarding their duty times based on real-time operational conditions. However, too many airlines exert undue pressure on pilots, turning discretion into an expectation rather than a choice. This not only undermines the PIC’s authority but also increases fatigue risks, ultimately compromising flight safety.

Similarly, decisions on flying into conflict zones should always rest with the cockpit crew, who are best positioned to assess the risks based on real-time intelligence and operational conditions. Pilots must have the authority to decline flights into dangerous areas without fear of retaliation or contractual repercussions. Safety must always take precedence over operational or commercial pressures.

Additionally, some airlines continue to summon pilots under medical leave to so-called “informational meetings.” This practice contributes to a culture of intimidation, directly opposing the principles of a Just Safety Culture—one of the key pillars of aviation safety. Pilots should be able to report fatigue, health issues, or operational concerns without fear of retribution.

Respecting the authority of the PIC and the cockpit crew is not just a matter of regulation; it is a cornerstone of aviation safety. Airlines must uphold the highest safety standards by ensuring that pilots can exercise their professional judgment without undue pressure. BeCA, along with ECA, IFALPA, and other pilot associations, strongly advocates for the reinforcement of these fundamental principles.