
Safety
The timeline of safety investigations

A case study of SK2590
Recently, the Belgian Air Accident Investigation Unit (AAIU) published its preliminary report for the aborted takeoff of the SAS Airbus 320 on 5 February 2026 from Brussels (BRU) to Copenhagen (CPH).
link to the preliminary report
Typically, a preliminary report is published within 30 days after the event. The report remains factual and displays a timeline of events. There will be no « lessons learned » in this publication.
AAIU investigation into SK2590 now moves to analysis phase
Now that the preliminary report into flight SK2590 has been published and the factual elements have been set out, the AAIU investigation will move into its next phase: the analysis.
In aviation, the objective of an investigation is not to assign blame, but to learn. That is exactly what will happen now. Only by understanding why events unfolded as they did can meaningful improvements be made to further strengthen safety.
The final report, which should be published within 12 months after the event, will undoubtedly include safety recommendations. These recommendations should in no way be seen as implying liability or blame. Their sole purpose is to make aviation safer for everyone. Every EASA safety investigation follows this same structure and timing.
Our association is also pleased with the tone of the preliminary report and remains confident that the Just Culture principle will continue to guide the investigation through to the final report. BeCA technical experts will continue to share relevant expertise when requested.
Finally, we are happy to report that both pilots have resumed flying. This is a clear reminder that there is no safety benefit in punishing people for honest mistakes, even when the potential consequences could have been very serious.


