Here is a list of most relevant new IFALPA position papers and briefing leaflets published since the first edition of 2016 of our Cockpit Flash:

RWY Status lights – 16AGEBL01

The aim of this Briefing Leaflet is to introduce the core elements of Runway Status Lights (RWSL) as they have been deployed and identify the operational considerations relevant to flight crews: http://bit.ly/2jK7eed

All Engine-Out Taxi (AEOT) – 16POS13

Several concepts are being developed to enable aircraft ground movement without any aircraft engine running. IFALPA supports technical developments that can help reducing noise, emissions and fuel, but reminds that safe and sustainable All Engine-Out Taxi (AEOT) can only be achieved provided a number of general, design and operational requirements are met: http://bit.ly/2hfSvFl.

Background Checks for Pilots – 16POS13

IFALPA clarifies its position on background checks on pilots, given the arbitrary and sometimes unclear methods used by some National Authorities: http://bit.ly/2h9DfKF.

Behavioural Detection as a Security Measure – 16SECBL02

New security methods focus on dangerous people instead of focusing on dangerous objects regardless of who carries them. One promising technique is Behavioural Detection, a method which works in addition to existing aviation security measures. It uses trained analysts in the airport environment to identify individuals who may represent a threat. It focuses exclusively on a person’s intent and is independent of any new product emerging as a threat to aviation security. For a more detailed explanation of this method, its advantages and aspects to be considered, read the briefing leaflet: http://bit.ly/2l3qqUG.

Cyber Threats – 16POS08

The IFALPA Security Committee has identified the possibility of a cyber-attack against an aircraft, ground facility, or other critical infrastructure to be a significant threat that may cause unsafe situations or ultimately even loss of life. The purpose of this paper is to articulate this threat, and suggest ways in which it might be addressed: http://bit.ly/2gCETAT.

Similar Call Signs – 16POS07

IFALPA believes that in order to avoid confusion operators should be encouraged to use alpha-numerical flight identifications. Using Call Sign Similarity software tools, these should be coordinated in advance on a regional and preferably global scale to avoid any possible overlap. These alpha-numeric call signs should not be complicated to pronounce and limited to a maximum of three characters. Read more: http://bit.ly/2gRwObG. Refer also to EUROCONTROL’s recommendation to opt for alphanumeric call signs:http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Call-sign_Confusion.

Read also AeroSafetyWorld’s article about accidents and incidents due to confusing clearance: “Flight level two hundred”: http://beca.be/magazines/asw/Flight-Level-Two-Hundred_AR_ASW-08-2016.pdf